Grade Level Communication

In writing and publishing, there is the idea of “readability”. The “Flesch Readability Grade Level” calculation scores the level of readability of a piece of writing based on grade level. 

From Paul Smith’s Lead with a Story: “Long, complex sentences with bigger words result in a higher grade level. But unlike a school exam, a high score here isn’t better. The score doesn’t reflect the intelligence of the ideas, just the complexity of the writing style. So a high score doesn’t mean you’re smart. It means you’re a bad writer.” 

He continues “. . . articles in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times typically score between grade level 8 and 10 on this scale. That’s about right for impactful, decisive business communication. Even popular fiction writers like John Grisham and Tom Clancy write around a 7 or 8 on this scale, which is one reason their books are such good reads . . . Unfortunately, many businesspeople write at a 12 to 15 on this scale, which is much too complex . . . It shouldn’t be a chore. Save their brainpower to think about the meaning and impact of your idea.” 

What would happen if we in Christian media adopted the same idea on the understandability of spiritual communication? Imagine a system where we keep the “intelligence of the ideas” but we work toward clarity of understanding with our words, images, ideas. And we use grade levels to do it. Deep meaning delivered with clarity. 

To paraphrase Paul Smith: “Long, complex sentences with narrowly understood words result in a higher ‘grade level.’ The score doesn’t reflect the profoundness of the ideas, just the complexity of the writing style. So a high score doesn’t mean you’re smart. It means you’re a bad Christian communicator . . . Unfortunately, many Christian communicators write at a 12 to 15 on this scale, which is much too complex. It shouldn’t be a chore. Save their brainpower to think about the meaning and impact of your idea.” 

At Finney Media, we help with this. We believe in profound spiritual meaning delivered with widely understood, heart-connective words and ideas. We’ve done research to better understand what is widely understood so that it’s not a chore and that we save their brainpower to think about the meaning and impact of your idea . . . and that they hopefully take a step in the direction of Jesus!    

Whenever people ask me why they should put the time and expense into listener research, the following story comes to mind:

This one radio station’s morning host just wasn’t getting it. Every morning he was doing the show he wanted to do, but listeners just weren’t connecting or coming back. So, management scheduled focus groups, the kind where you put listeners around a table to talk about a topic. And, then you have folks from the organization behind the glass to watch and take notes. They invited the morning host to come hear what the listeners had to say about his show.

Predictably, the listeners trashed the show. After listening to the abuse for some time, the beleaguered morning host leaned over to his Program Director and griped, “What do they know? They’re just listeners.” And, he was serious.

His stint with the station didn’t last much longer.

We laugh (and maybe cry) at that story. And yet, sometimes, I do that! We all do that! We think we know better than our listeners regarding what they want. What they’ll come for. What they’ll stay for. What they’ll come back for.

And, so often we miss the mark. Because we are not our listeners. That’s why it’s so important that we ask them. It’s hard for us to understand without asking what they want to hear.

The whole point of listener research is to help us to see through our listener’s perspective. Because we’re daily a part of the endeavor, we actually think about what we’re creating and airing. Which means we’re just too close to it. Way too close to it. If what we want is more people listening or reading or watching, we need to understand better what they perceive, what they are familiar with, and what they like and don’t like. We need to understand what they expect.

So, why put the time and expense into listener research? Because the more we step out of our own perspectives and into theirs, the more likely they are to give us a listen, read our blogs, and watch our videos. And that right there is our goal. So unless you’re a mind-reader, you can’t afford not to!

As we talk with Christian radio listeners, a desire from media for a more uplifting, gentle and innocent tone keeps coming up.  It’s almost as if it’s the equal and opposite reaction to our coarser, angrier world. So, it appears that the Christian radio listener’s desire for uplifting, spiritual, gentle and innocent goes up as the world gets more obnoxious.    

We see this in the Christmas TV show and movies preferred by Christian radio listeners. Tied for number 1 were Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer and Elf. Uplifting innocence onscreen. 

Read our latest Finney Fast Five article “Top Five TV shows and Movies” preferred by Christian radio listeners. 

What we didn’t see was much interest in more “serious” Christmas classics like Little Drummer Boy or The Nativity Story or A Christmas Carol. Or, more recent “classics” with contentious themes like The Santa Clause or Christmas With The Kranks.  

It looks like our listeners/viewers/readers don’t want “cranky” mixed with “Christmas”. 

And, supporting this, finishing strongly just outside our Top 5 TV shows and movies was something that isn’t just one TV show or movie – it’s a collection of them. The Hallmark All-Christmas Marathon. Many folks mentioned it even though it’s not a specific movie. The whole idea of a “blanket” of Christmas movies resonates.  

All of this should inform us just how we Christmas this year. Make it about the Christ child. Put Luke 2 at the center of your sound (and, yes, playing Linus’s reading of it is still the best with our listeners).  

Here’s our core advice:  When you have the choice, lean proactively in the direction of what you are doing; being uplifting, gentle, and innocent.   

This year at Thanksgiving, Tom Hanks will bring us the story of Fred Rogers—Mr. Rogers to most—in a movie called It’s a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood.  The mark of Mr. Rogers was kindness—in words, in how he listened and in how he focused his attention. 

In our new book Wisdom for Effective Communication; The Little Book of Big Ideas, we have a chapter that zeros in on this Christian grace.  Especially during the holidays and especially in our raucous times, we thought it good to remind us all just what that means.  Here’s an excerpt from the chapter entitled ‘Use Kind Words”. 

Excerpt from Wisdom for Effective Communication; The Little Book of Big Ideas:  

Saying sweet nothings. Buttering up. Flattery. Is this affirmation? Well, at my firm, and in my personal life, I say no. 

Dictionary.com defines affirmation as: confirmationorratificationofthetruth. 

Here’s my take on it: Affirmation is saying what is true and kind without a critical “but.It’s speaking the truth in love. 

Flattery is stretching the truth. Youre so good that you make everyone else look bad!” 

Criticism is a truth that is negative. “You should have taken more time with this project, and now it’s a mess.” 

But consider affirmation. There is always something to be recognized, something that says, you matter and you are important. 

“You did a remarkable job locating all the quotes.” 

“Your birthday says to me that God had a purpose for you to be here today.” 

How is your little girl? I remember how well-behaved she is for a four-year-old.” 

Affirmation is a salve in a wounding, critical world. It creates a welcoming atmosphere and sets you up to have a better reception for whatever communication will be taking place.  

I didn’t naturally realize this, and I certainly wasn’t born with the inclination to affirm. But over the years I noticed things. And I learned. 

I’m still learning.  And this holiday time will be another practice session in kindness.  I invite you to join me. 

You can purchase Wisdom for Effective Communication; The Little Book of Big Ideas on AMAZON.

 

Special Note: We’ll introduce the book in a ten minute webinar at 11:30 a.m. CT/12:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, November 12th.  Mark your calendar for this lunchtime.

“Think about it: How much will you open up if you don’t trust me? The bottom line is that how much you share is based on how much you trust me and the relationship.” —Wisdom for Effective Communication

Chuck Finney, President of Finney Media, spent decades in radio helping programmers discover how to craft their words for the most effective communication with the listener.  During those years, he was also a husband, father and leader. He learned what it meant to “say the wrong thing” and how that can put a wrinkle in life. But, he also learned to “say the better thing”.

If you’ve had some of those same struggles, Chuck has opened up his heart to help you learn from the mistakes he’s made. He’s authored the book “Wisdom for Effective Communication; The Little Book of Big Ideas”, a quick read full of deep truths.

“When the meaning is deeply important, a story is what makes the meaning real, what makes it reach deep into a person’s heart.” —Wisdom for Effective Communication

In this book he unveils the secrets: what works, what doesn’t, and—most importantly—the attitudes to start with before you say a single word. Learn to communicate more clearly, more deeply, and in a way that leaves others better off for it!

This book is ideal for leaders, parents, managers, and virtually anyone who wants to more effectively communicate and connect with those around them. The principles are straightforward and to the point, so you can start applying them right away.

This book can be pre-ordered right now on AMAZON. We suggest doing it today, while it’s top of mind.

For more information visit: Wisdomforeffectivecommunication.com. Currently available as an e-book and soon in print.

By Chuck Finney with Jan Shober

By Chuck Finney with Jan Shober, taken from a chapter titled “Not About You      

Want a revolution in your communication? Ask people about themselves. Ask your partner, listener, friend, grandchild, or date about likes, wants, visions, or desires 

This game-changing move will dramatically up your communication effectiveness. 

I remember my first date with my wife Lynda. I reeled off stories and chatter the entire time—all about myself. My hometown of Cincinnati, my sports teams, my radio history for goodness sake! What a bore! Lynda was unimpressed. She considered saying no to a second date. Who wants to be with someone who only cares to hear his own voice?    

Things have changed significantly for me since those fateful first days of dating. 

I landed at a station that was tuned into the listenerto win more listeners. The program director brought what was then a new concept to the station. He reminded the team, “Our difference is that we talk to listeners and play what they want.” At that time (this was pre-computer), research consisted of using the telephone book and calling folks to ask them if they would participate in a survey. People would then rate the music they liked. And, here’s the intriguing part: That music was different than what was on the national charts. Way different!  

You know what happened? Our station, an AM music station, beat a competing FM station for audience size. That never happens! But, we were listening to our listeners.      

Another talented friend worked with me in the early 90s. When our station hired him from legendary News/Talk KMOX in St. Louis, one of the things I was aware of was that KMOX dominated radio listening in St. Louis. And, stations like that always do things the listener loves. But, we broadcasters have a hard time understanding some of these things if we aren’t from their market. I asked what one of those things was on KMOX. He told me I wasn’t going to believe him. “Yknow what they do that people love that would surprise you? The Lord’s Prayer! People go crazy over it being on the radio!”  

Pre-order your copy of “The Little Book of Big Ideas: Wisdom for Effective Communication” and get it to your Kindle when it’s released on November 12th.

Listen to this exclusive audio interview from author Chuck Finney:

Many secular communicators use Christian values in their storytelling. Think about Disney and Budweiser—dogs and horses and lately even stepdads!

They use Christian values such as love, peace, generosity. These values resonate with us because we might be storytelling toward a similar value.

What is their goal?  To sell tickets or in Budweiser’s case to sell beer. To get you to buy their product.

Christian story uses similar values or themes. But, our goal is very different. Our goal is to help our listener/viewer/reader take a step toward Jesus! We long to help a reader/viewer/listener think differently about their connection with Jesus.

We hopefully tell the story in a way that reaches people of varying levels of spiritual maturity, so that someone who is a devout believer could understand and want to follow Jesus more closely, in the same manner as someone who isn’t even in church right now.

Paul David Tripp is a Christian counselor and author. He tells the story in Instruments In The Redeemer’s Hands about a counseling session where the husband and wife sit down and she starts crying before he even finishes praying. Her angry husband is impatient.  They dive into the discussion and she starts talking about her story. The husband gets mad, jumps up and walks out. Heads to his car.

Paul prays with the wife and says, “I’m going to go track down your husband.”

Paul chases him out to the parking lot. He says, “I understand that you are angry and hurt and this is really hard. But, I’m going to go back in and rejoin your wife.”

As he’s walking in, he realizes that the husband is right behind him. The man says, “I can’t keep running away!”

Months later, after significant improvement in their relationship and their ability to talk to each other, the husband shares from his heart about that fateful day in the parking lot.

He says, “I don’t have any idea what you said that day. I only remember that you came after me!”*

Thank you, Lord, for this example of how we’re supposed to be with the people in our lives, with the people to whom we minister. Help us to reach others with stories that bring them closer to you!

*Story summarized from Paul Tripp’s book TITLE.Google Paul Tripp Marriage books and you’ll see the options.

There’s a topic many are discussing these days, and it may surprise you.  Worship.  From articles in magazines to blog discussions, it’s a topic with opinions. Because it’s important to Christian radio formats, we sat down with Chuck, and asked a few questions.  This is an edited Q & A with him, recorded in June of 2019.  You can listen to the audio for yourself if you prefer below. -Jan Shober, Finney Media

Worship is under discussion broadly, and in radio.  What’s your reaction? 

Many of the folks we work with—the leaders in media groups—have a clear missional focus on worship. And, when we talk to listeners about worship, they, too, respond very positively.  Many of these listeners are in a core group that are close to a station, but even if you test and talk to listeners on the fringes of an audience, they are positive.  And not just positive with a little p.  It’s a big deal. Positives surrounding a statement such as “I listen to my favorite station for help with worshiping God throughout the day” come in very high.

So, the Teaching format is reflective of this worship interest as well? How do folks in the Teaching format perceive worship?

Some may have thought of worship as something that is CCM related due to the music, but teaching listeners think of their stations as worshipful as well. These listeners are looking for things that help them worship throughout the day.  It turns out that things like prayer and Scripture do just that. It’s a bit like a three-way conversation with the station, them and God.  Of course this isn’t every single person because everyone hears it differently. But identification with worship is definitely high.

And for CCM, do we see the same worship interest?

With CCM you have a broader group of listeners who are less churched than their teaching counterparts, but a big part of what they are there for is for help with worshiping God throughout the day.  We saw that in the 2018 Why Listen?® nationwide survey, a perceptual study.  Things that are worshipful showed up as very high for these audiences.

Taking this a step further, once a leader understands this interest, what is the next step?

Leaders must decide the spiritual temperature for their ministry!  And once that is committed to, it needs to be communicated to everyone on their team.  Everybody needs to be on same page as to mission!  When the team is on the same page, they can be relentless about going to their listeners and finding out where they are, confirming and learning what they will respond to.  The good news is this:  Christian radio listeners lean toward things that are more missional!

Want to know more about engaging with your listener (or viewer or reader)?  Finney Media can help with perceptual research, with music research, and with programming consulting.  Contact us HERE.

For more on the Why Listen?® survey findings, look through reports HERE.

One of our team sat behind the window at a focus group with a morning show host.  The listeners of the radio station where the host spent his weekday mornings gathered around the table, and talked about him.  The comments were pointed and not complimentary.  “Talks too much. Doesn’t bring a smile to my face.”  After a few minutes, the host said to those with him, “What do they know?  They’re just listeners!”

This story, while funny to some, illustrates that each of us has a tendency to forget that we’re broadcasting forour listeners (or viewers or readers, depending on the medium).  As the professionals in the room, we’re here to touch hearts, and reach people with good news so they’ll take a step in the direction of Jesus.

For a downloadable webinar on this topic, watch “WHAT’S COOKING? A/B TESTING YOUR AUDIO AND DIGITAL PRESENCE“.

How can the situation be improved?  In a word: Testing.

What might we test for audience input?  Here are a few quick examples:

  • Subject lines of emails
  • Different versions of your website
  • Different social media posts/one item different
  • Different titles
  • Different audio or video script versions

Some research folks call this split testing. There are two versions of a piece of media, with one the control.  In the digital space, half of audience gets one version and the other half gets the alternate.

Let’s break the process down into steps:

  1. Serve up two versions. Here’s an example of two versions of a podcast opening:
  2. Determine your testers and how you’ll connect with them. In person?  Digitally? Here it could be a specific set or type of folks, sub-sets of your mailing lists like donors or a certain age.
  3. Next, determine the questions and how to ask—what exact words. If website is presenting the two versions, you’ll wind up with a count.  But this area can be questions.
  4. Now, consider how the data will be collected. Will it be automated?  Do you need a place to store the data?
  5. Finally, what analytics will you have available to review? Be sure to set this up in advance.

Now you are ready to begin.  We recommend doing this often.  You may be surprised at the results.  We often are.  What did you think of our two samples?  Feel free to email us your thoughts at info@finneymedia.com

For a downloadable webinar on this topic, watch “WHAT’S COOKING? A/B TESTING YOUR AUDIO AND DIGITAL PRESENCE“.

Read Part 1.

By today’s standards, Rogers’ show would be considered quite tame. But, back in the 60’s and 70’s, he presented some radical, often Biblically-based ideas.

In an unscripted episode, Rogers had a heart-to-heart conversation with a young quadriplegic boy named Jeff Erlanger. Jeff captivated the audience as he explained to a curious Rogers how his electric wheelchair worked and why he needed it. Then the two of them broke out in a song called, “It’s You I Like.” Jeff had been a longtime fan of the show and it was his parents that arranged the meeting. Then in 1999, Jeff Erlanger made a surprise appearance to introduce Rogers as he was inducted into the Television Hall of Fame.  Rogers didn’t see it coming and literally “leaped” out of his seat, running to the stage to meet Erlanger onstage.

Just like humans, Roger’s make-believe characters were created with flaws and foibles. Lady Elaine Fairchild was often a prideful, selfish brat. But she always accepted Mister Rogers’ stern, loving correction.

Daniel the Striped Tiger was painfully shy and extremely insecure, but Mister Rogers helped him realize that he was valued, accepted and loved.  King Friday the Xlll wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, even though he was King. But Mister Rogers always paid him the respect he deserved.

“We all have different gifts, so we all have different ways of saying to the world who we are.” ~ Fred Rogers

His shows dealt with some sensitive subjects and he explored these themes each week. Some were complex social issues that parents rarely discussed with their children, including Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination, racism and the ever-growing problem of divorce. He even took a trip to the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh to teach kids not to be afraid of hospitals.

During the Gulf War, after promising his TV family that all children in the neighborhood would be well cared for, he called parents to task on the air, asking them to make a promise as well, to take care of their children. In response to the September 11th terrorist attacks, Rogers aired PSAs for parents and teachers, explaining how to discuss tragic events with young ones.

“We at Family Communications have discovered that when children bring up something frightening, it’s helpful right away to ask them what they know about it. Probably what children need to hear most from us adults is that they can talk with us about anything, and that we will do all we can to keep them safe in any scary time.” ~ Fred Rogers

HIS MUSIC
Fred’s goal was to teach children to love themselves and others, and to not be afraid. He composed nearly 300 songs with those ideas in mind.  One particularly comforting song explained to worried little minds that no, they can’t in fact be sucked down a bathroom drain, because they will not fit.  Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’s closing song, “Tomorrow”, was a song of hope. A song that promised his children that he would indeed be back, and that he hoped they would all be feeling happy and “snappy” until his return.

HIS ADULT LIFE
In the adult world, Fred Rogers was dedicated to putting children first. He believed that children should be allowed to legally record his show, and successfully advocated for fair-use TV show recording. He also testified before a U.S. Senate committee to push for government funding of children’s television, and got it to the tune of 20 million dollars. Wikipedia reports that he went on to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom, 40 honorary degrees, and a Peabody Award. He was inducted into the Television Hall of Fame and was recognized in two congressional resolutions. He was ranked number 35 of the TV Guide’s “Fifty Greatest TV Stars of All Time”. The Smithsonian displays one of his trademark sweaters as a “Treasure of American History”. Those TV sweaters were knitted by his mother. Just by donning her handmade sweaters, he was making a statement about the value of a parent’s love.

NOT THE END
Fred Rogers was diagnosed with stomach cancer in December 2002. He passed away on February 27, 2003. But his legacy lived on. His widow Joanne Byrd Rogers became a champion for children, encouraging them to take on leadership roles. She helped preserve his legacy by staying active in leadership roles within the Fred Rogers Company and at the Fred M. Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media.

To commemorate the 50th anniversary of “Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood”, PBS aired a special in March. A new documentary film, “Won’t You Be My Neighbor?” directed by Morgan Neville, debuted at the Sundance Film Festival.

“The way he led his life, I believe dad tried to follow the example of Christ — and did in such a fabulous way.” ~ James Rogers 

No doubt about it, Fred Rogers intentionally allowed himself to be emotionally honest and vulnerable for all children. In honor of his unique integrity and unparalleled contributions, The U.S. House of Representatives unanimously passed Resolution 111 “for his legendary service to the improvement of the lives of children, his steadfast commitment to demonstrating the power of compassion, and his dedication to spreading kindness through example.”

And no doubt about it, a life well lived.

REFERENCES: 

THE FRED ROGERS CENTER

FRED ROGERS PRODUCTIONS

LITTLETHINGS.COM

BIOGRAPHY.COM

PBS.ORG

URBAN MILWAUKEE

FOCUS FILMS

KNOXVILLE NEWS SENTINEL

PITTSBURG CITY PAPER